Franchising
- What should franchisees expect?
By Manzoor
G. K. Ishani, MA, MASA, FRSA, FINSTCPD, FSALS Solicitor
In the early
days of franchising in the UK, when franchisors and franchisees
tended to be less
sophisticated and streetwise, franchise agreements contained
a host of detailed obligations which the franchisor offered
to perform for its franchisees. These days, when reviewing franchise
agreements for clients, banks etc. I am increasingly coming
across clauses which
deal with the franchisor's obligations which are fewer in number,
more general (rather than specific) in nature and short on detail
as to exactly what it is that the franchisor will do for its
franchisee.
There are
a number of theories as to why this is so; the more specific
the obligations, the more demanding will be the franchisee,
the greater the detail, the greater the inflexibility. It is
not so much the number of obligations but rather their nature
which is important, franchisees
are now much better informed and confident of their rights and
expectations than was previously the case. Some of these theories
are based on sound principles, others less so, whilst some are
a poor attempt at thinly disguising a hidden agenda.
All this
is small comfort to a prospective franchisee who is eager to
know what the industry norm or standard is by which they can
judge their particular franchisor.
After having
spent time explaining to a prospective franchisee the reasons
why franchise agreements are in a standard form and why franchisors
will brook no amendments, it becomes difficult to explain to
them why franchisors are not required to accept 'standard'
obligations. This argument whilst attractive on the face of
it, is facile when examined more closely. Much of course depends
upon the nature of the business. The sorts of obligations which
a franchisee should rightly expect from a franchisor of a fried
chicken business are going to vary considerably from those expected
of a franchisor of a retail confectionery or dry cleaning business.
Nevertheless, almost all professional advisors and ethical franchisors
would agree that there are certain franchisor obligations which
are fundamental to ethical franchising irrespective of the nature
of the business franchised.
Training
It is a sine qua non of franchising that franchisors must have
an unequivocal obligation to train franchisees in how to operate
the franchised business and this obligation to train must continue
beyond initial training so that franchisors are obliged to provide
continuing and
further training to franchisees during the subsistence of the
franchise agreement.
Protection
and reputation
Franchisees pay franchisors for the right to use the franchisor's
intellectual property such as the trade name, trade marks, know-how,
copyright, business system etc. Franchisors should do whatever
they can to protect their intellectual property and should be
under an obligation
to continue protecting their intellectual property including,
where necessary and sensible, taking court proceedings against
infringers. A balance has to be struck between what is necessary,
desirable or practicable and the interests of the franchisor,
the franchisee and the
franchised network as a whole. Nevertheless, franchise agreements
should contain provisions relating to this so that prospective
franchisees can make a decision, as to whether such provisions
are acceptable to them or not, on an informed basis.
Support
Crucial to any successful franchised operation is the level
of support a franchisor gives to its franchisees in its operation
of its franchised business. This after all is one of the things
franchisees pay for. There should therefore be a positive obligation
on the part of the franchisor to provide such support as a franchisee
may reasonably require to enable the franchisee to run his or
her franchised business in accordance with the franchisor's
system. The level of support required will vary from one franchisee
to another. This is one example where previously detailed provisions
in franchise agreements have now changed and have become more
general in nature. Franchisors are aware of the fact that a
line needs to be drawn between supporting franchisees in genuine
need of support and those who, for reasons best known to themselves,
are so demanding of their franchisor's support as to substitute
it for their own efforts so that they eventually, if not quickly,
become reliant upon it for the success of their businesses.
Improvements
I am convinced that the obligation to enhance, develop and improve
the system, the services, the product range etc. of a franchised
business lies squarely with the franchisor. To me this obligation
is fundamental and one which cannot be delegated to franchisees.
One of the
principal obligations of franchisees is to sell the goods and
or services which are the subject of the franchise, not to develop
them. Of course, franchisees should be involved in assisting
franchisors to a reasonable extent in pilot/marketing testing
any improvements. Mature
franchisors also encourage franchisees to use their initiative
to think of improvements and innovations and to relate any ideas
they may have as to how the business or the system may be improved,
to the franchisor, but it is the franchisor who must decide
whether an idea
is worth taking up, developing and subsequently when ready,
passing it to the rest of the franchised network to incorporate
into the franchised system. Many great ideas (such as the MacDonalds
'Big Mac') were the brainchild of a franchisee. Nevertheless,
this is not a substitute for franchisors expending time and
resources in research and development. Ideas from franchisees
are always to be welcomed but must not be substituted for the
franchisor's obligations.
Quality
control
Different franchisors have different methods of ensuring that
quality is maintained throughout their franchised network but
before franchisors can do this they must be sure of the quality
of their own system, products etc. This is best done by demonstration
and these days very few if any franchisees will buy a franchise
without having first satisfied themselves that the franchisor
has pilot tested it. These days, the sale of a franchise is
a sale by sample. Having established the requisite quality and
standards, the franchisor must then provide sufficient
mechanisms in the franchise agreement to enable it to ensure
that franchisees operate to the same standards. Strictly speaking,
although not an obligation on the part of a franchisor, the
nature of this obligation is such that it is mutual in that
it is as much in the franchisee's
interest to maintain quality as it is in the franchisor's interest
to ensure that quality is maintained.
Advertising
marketing and promotions
This is one obligation about which not everybody will agree.
Some feel that the obligation to provide, conduct, co-ordinate
etc. advertising marketing and promotions of the franchise,
at least at the national level, should be that of the franchisor.
Much depends upon the nature of the business. In some cases
franchisors are content to leave it to franchisees and feel
that their franchised business is such that it would benefit
little by any form of national advertising. Other businesses
are increasingly becoming reliant upon national or regional
advertising, marketing and promotions as a necessary feature
to ensure success of a franchised business. If the nature of
the franchise business is such that advertising marketing and
promotions at a national or regional level is necessary, the
franchisor should not be allowed to abrogate its
responsibility in this regard and should be obliged to be involved
at an appropriate level for this purpose. Even in businesses
which do not need any form of direct advertising, marketing
or promotions, many franchisors still undertake an obligation
to provide franchisees with
artwork, bromides, flyers, leaflets, point of sale material
etc. thereby ensuring quality, standardisation and economies
of scale for its franchisees.
One can
think of many more obligations which one could add to the above
list, particularly if one takes into account industry standards
in operations such as quick printing, fast food, parcel delivery
etc. Nevertheless, it is to be hoped that the foregoing will
at least help
prospective franchisees and those advising them, to get some
sort of 'feel' for what they should be looking for.
©
Manzoor G. K. Ishani.
All rights reserved. (Revised) June 2006